Is this a course or live sessions?
Live working sessions, run on your own brand and products, in person in Jeddah or remotely. It is not a recorded course. The value is in feedback on your team's actual output, which a video cannot give.
Training teaches an in-house marketing team to produce AI video and content to a professional standard, using your own brand and your own products as the working material. It suits businesses that already have someone doing marketing and would rather build the capability internally than outsource it indefinitely.
If you publish occasionally and want it to look right, hiring the work out makes sense. If you publish constantly — a brand with several products, frequent offers, a busy account — outsourcing every asset becomes the most expensive way to solve a problem your own team could handle.
The obstacle is rarely willingness. Your marketing person has almost certainly tried these tools already, got something that looked convincing in a demo and unusable in practice, and quietly went back to what they knew. That gap between a promising first attempt and reliable output is where the training sits.
It is taught on your brand, with your products and your guidelines, so what your team produces during the sessions is work you can actually publish rather than exercises they throw away.
Sessions are working sessions. Your team produces real assets during them, not demonstrations.
What your team already does, what they have tried, and what you publish. This sets what is worth teaching and what to skip.
Run on your own brand and products. Every session ends with output you could publish, not a slide deck.
The workflow written down for your team specifically — tools, steps, prompts, standards — so it survives someone leaving.
A review after your team has run a cycle alone, which is when the real questions surface. Included in the proposal.
The tools take an afternoon to learn. Knowing which output to throw away is the part that takes teaching.
Live working sessions, run on your own brand and products, in person in Jeddah or remotely. It is not a recorded course. The value is in feedback on your team's actual output, which a video cannot give.
Small groups work best, because everyone should be producing during the session rather than watching. Team size is agreed in the proposal, and larger groups are split rather than crowded into one session.
The specific tools are chosen against what you produce and what you can spend, and subscription costs are stated before anything is committed. Training deliberately covers the method rather than one product, because these tools change quickly and the judgement transfers.
Yes, in Arabic, English, or both together, which is usually what mixed teams prefer.
Then the follow-up session addresses exactly that, and it is included rather than sold separately. Realistically, the first cycle a team runs alone is where the genuine problems appear — which is why the follow-up is built into the structure rather than offered as an upsell.
Yes. Agencies adding generated production to their own service offering are a common case, and the sessions run the same way using your clients' categories as the working material.
Team size, what they produce now, and what they have already tried. That decides whether training or production is the better spend.